In Aldiss and Wingrove’s article “On the Origin of the
Species: Mary Shelly” promoting Shelly as the founder of science fiction, they
wrote, “This book (referring to James Gunn’s collection of essays “Speculations
on Speculation”) however, makes it clear that we can recognize SF fairly
easily, although it is rarely found in a pure isolated state. Just like
oxygen.”
This got me to thinking that literary conventions, tropes,
archetypes, even styles, could call be considered elements of literature. The
mixing and matching of these elements creates compounds that we call stories.
Long and complicated strings of compounds become novels.
A literary SF novel could be called one part prose and two
parts SF (Sf2P) just as water is referred to as H2O. Paranormal romance could R2H(orror). Just
about any romance novel would be R2-something: R2S(uspence), R2C(omedy). I think Star Wars would AFSf while Star Trek
would be Sf2F. Firefly would be Sf2W.
This simple coding could tell anyone at a glance just what
they are getting into, and perhaps even lend a more scientific organization to
literature as a whole. Maybe after all the different novels and movies have
been coded, we could match them up with the “Rotten Tomatoes” website and see
if particular balances get better or worse ratings.
So I’ve started a table. Any suggestions for filling in the
blanks?
A=Action/Adventure
B=?
C=Children’s
D=Dark
E=Erotic
F=Fantasy
G=gothic
H=humorous
I=?
J=?
K=
L=literary
M=mystery
N=?
O=?
P=Poetical prose
Q=?
R=romance
S=suspense
Sf=science fiction
T=thriller
U=?
V=?
W=western
X=women’s
Y=men’s
Z=?
No comments:
Post a Comment