I was a little surprised that this textbook was written by
an American, since America plays such a minor role. Granted, when it was
published America was new to being a superpower, but it even makes our roles in
the First and Second World Wars feel so trivial.
It was also written before professors stopping putting their
own conscious opinions into the textbooks, so we get little authorial asides
about which historical figures he wishes to redeem. For example, he goes out of
his way to write that the appeasement of Hitler wasn’t entirely Chamberlain’s
fault; English memories of WWI were still too painful and the Depression was
keeping their concerns economic. The last several Prime Ministers had been
trying to help Germany recover to become a market for British goods, and the
Germans electing who the Brits thought at the time was just some nutter wasn’t
going to stop their desperate economic policies.
The take home lesson from reading these 800+ pages was the
precariousness of good government. For 2000 years, England has wavered from
good to bad government, regardless of being monarchical or democratic. Power
shifts that have little to do with policies and too much with politics change
the government of their, and probably most, countries. It’s rather depressing to be reading about a
good king or prime minister doing their best only to have it set back by a
following incompetent.
And yet progress is made. England did become wealthier and
more democratic, often times in spite of their leaders. Progress comes from
innovators, grass roots movements, and the expansion of knowledge, while
politicians play their games.
No comments:
Post a Comment